Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Abraham Washington's avatar

Thanks Bob for raising our conversation on Rick Wilson's page to the level of a post of its own merit. That's a very good use of Substack material, and I may follow suit.

I wonder, however, if you could edit your subtitle to include my link, as in:

An antifascist Substacker (https://neofascism.substack.com/) who's furious at disinformation.

Thanks again, and welcome to Substack. We may be preaching to the choir, but we need to motivate every possible Dem voter to get out and defeat Trump.

Expand full comment
Don Klemencic's avatar

"Our Framers loathed Faction. The evils of Faction are all over the Federalist Papers and there's not a word in the Constitution about political parties."

Bob,

It's a shame that Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) wasn't conceived until the nineteenth century. I want to believe the Constitutional Founders would have mandated it in the Constitution had it been available to them. With the plurality, first-past-the-post voting system they were apparently stuck with, the Voters' Dilemma was created, which in turn created the Spoiler Effect, the guarantor and sustainer of the Political Duopoly (from Federalist vs. Democratic Republican (Jeffersonian)--to Democratic (Jacksonian) vs. Whig--to Democratic vs. Republican. The only outsider to overcome the spoiler effect was Abraham Lincoln, who accomplished it because the Democratic Party in 1860 split into two pieces over the slavery issues. Those two pieces united would have defeated Lincoln. Lincoln's victory flipped the Duopoly: Whigs out, Republicans in.) With RCV, overcoming the Voters' Dilemma is simple: make your favorite candidate your first choice and your "lesser of two evils" from the Duopoly your second choice. Without the penalty of "wasting your vote", non-Duopoly candidates would have a reasonable chance of winning--no Spoiler Effect. In time, without the maintaining safeguard of the Spoiler Effect, the Duopoly would weaken and eventually dissolve. In addition, for a candidate to eventually cumulate an absolute majority over the course of the rounds of Instant Runoffs enabled by RCV, he or she would need to be rational and conciliatory to accumulate second choice, third choice, etc. votes. Firebrands and demagogues would lose.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts